I am semi-seriously considering "live" blogging World War I. It would mean a great deal of research for me, and, yes, I would probably concentrate on the Belgian and French fronts of the war since I know them best, but I really feel that it's forgotten in the US. Also, Michael Gove's remarks back in January really got under my skin.
[Poll #1969614]
[Poll #1969614]
no subject
Date: 2014-05-26 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-26 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-26 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-26 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 12:14 am (UTC)GRRRRR.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 02:00 am (UTC)It was also a clusterfuck of epic proportions.
On the plus side, it effectively destroyed colonialism -- even if the death throes are still continuing, took the class system out at the knees allowing British and many European societies far more mobility than they previously had, and ultimately votes for women.
The cons include weakening the world's immune system so that the great flu could happen, incompetency among commanders of epic proportions based partially on a refusal to learn from -- or even read -- recent military history, and the Russian Revolution.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 03:03 pm (UTC)Use a free WP blog + twitter account, so you can be famous (and possibly earn ad/affiliate revenue).
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 06:32 pm (UTC)Will you start in June with the assassination or July with the official start of the war?
It really is a forgotten war in the US. :( What was Michael Gove's remarks about?
no subject
Date: 2014-05-27 07:48 pm (UTC)Michael Gove, Education Minister, disapproved of using supplemental materials which depicted the command and politicians in Britain as incompetent. He thought it unpatriotic. I think one can acknowledge that a war was waged for patriotic reasons -- including honoring a poorly thought out protection treaty -- without it meaning that the people in charge knew their asses from their elbows.