New Language use
Jan. 4th, 2011 03:06 pmAnother one that's bothering me.
Where in the world did "creeper" come from? Someone whose behavior is creepy is a creep. Why the extra syllable? I didn't notice this one before last year -- mostly around Mr. Schuester's actions in the Glee fandom (which I don't see as creepy, but can accept that others do).
And it's jibe (or Britishly gibe) if two things don't mesh, NOT jive. That's a dance. (Yeah, I've done that one before, but I've been seeing it again recently. *sigh*)
Where in the world did "creeper" come from? Someone whose behavior is creepy is a creep. Why the extra syllable? I didn't notice this one before last year -- mostly around Mr. Schuester's actions in the Glee fandom (which I don't see as creepy, but can accept that others do).
And it's jibe (or Britishly gibe) if two things don't mesh, NOT jive. That's a dance. (Yeah, I've done that one before, but I've been seeing it again recently. *sigh*)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 07:33 am (UTC)May I add one to the list? I've seen people use the phrase "reak havoc" or even "reek havoc." No, people, no.
I've also seen two people I know use the word "concur" when they mean "conquer" but I'm hoping that's some bit of autocorrect tomfoolery.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:49 pm (UTC)Sorely for Solely is one I came across today.
And a person REINS in his worst tendancies, not REIGNS. It comes from controlling a horse.
*sigh*
I refuse to think about CONCUR for CONQUER.
((hugs))
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 04:55 pm (UTC)Touching wasn't frowned upon when I went to school. I had teachers hug me when I needed it in high school, so I don't see Will's actions as anything untoward, but I know the zeitgeist has changed.